1… Ein kleiner Singvogel aus der Familie der Finken, serinus canaria domestica, originär heimisch auf den Inseln des Nord Atlantik.

2… Ein Mechanismus, um unsichere Bedingungen zu testen, ursprünglich durch die Nutzung von Kanarienvögeln in Kohleminen, um giftige Gase oder Einstürze zu bemerken. Wenn der Kanarienvogel starb, war es Zeit, aus der Mine zu kommen. In letzter Zeit wurde der Ausdruck im Zusammenhang mit Online-Diensten genutzt, für ein regelmäßig aktualisiertes Statement, dass der Dienst nicht von Rechtsprozessen betroffen ist. Wenn der Text nicht mehr regelmäßig aktualisiert wird, können Nutzer*innen erkennen, dass der Text nicht mehr wahr sein könnte.

Hash: SHA512

Riseup positively confirms that the integrity of our system is sound: all our infrastructure is in our control, we have not been compromised or suffered a data breach, we have not disclosed any private encryption keys, and we have not been forced to modify our system to allow access or information leakage to a third party.

This canary will be re-signed on the following dates:

* February 1
* May 1
* August 1
* November 1

We will include a link to a recent news article[1] in each update to establish that the signature was not pre-generated. 
h2. Frequently asked questions

Q: Are you compromised by law enforcement?

A: No. We have never permitted installation of any hardware or software monitoring on any system that we control; law enforcement has not taken our servers; does not, and has never had access to them. We would rather stop being Riseup before we did that.

Q: Couldn't the government just make you say that?

A: Forced speech is actually quite rare in the US legal context. It's usually only in cases of consumer protection where the government has been successful in compelling speech (e.g. forced cigarette warnings). Nevertheless, no they aren't forcing us to say anything.

Q: Why didn't you update your canary on time in the winter of 2016?

A: The canary was so broad that any attempt to issue a new one would be a violation of a gag order related to an investigation into a DDoS extortion ring and ransomware operation[0]. This is not desirable, because if any one of a number of minor things happen, it signals to users that a major thing has happened.

Q: Why does the new Canary not mention gag orders, FISA court orders, National Security Letters, etc?

A: Our initial Canary strategy was only harming users by freaking them out unnecessarily when minor events happened. A Canary is supposed to signal important risk information to users, but there is also danger in signaling the wrong thing to users or leading to general fear and confusion for no good reason. The current Canary is limited to significant events that could compromise the security of Riseup users.

0. https://riseup.net/about-us/press/canary-statement
1. https://theintercept.com/2017/05/01/cybersecurity-for-the-people-how-to-keep-your-chats-truly-private-with-signal/



Schritte zur Verifizierung

Um riseup’s Schlüssel herunter zu laden und die verwendete Schlüsselbezeichnung zu verifzieren, solltest Du diese Schritte befolgen. Danach kannst Du mit diesen Schritten diese Erklärung überprüfen:

  1. Lade das canary statement herunter
  2. Danach führe diesen Befehl in der Kommandozeile aus:
    gpg --verify canary-statement-signed.txt
  3. Die Ausgabe sollte so aussehen (das Datum kann entsprechend abweichen, je nachdem wann diese zuletzt unterzeichnet wurde):
gpg: Signature made Mon 15 Aug 2016 10:01:19 PM PDT
gpg:           using RSA key 0x3043E2B7139A768E
gpg: Good signature from "Riseup Networks <collective@riseup.net>"
gpg:                 aka "Riseup Treasurer <treasurer@riseup.net>"
gpg: Signature made Thu 16 Feb 2017 05:41:25 PM EST
gpg:                using RSA key 4E0791268F7C67EABE88F1B03043E2B7139A768E
gpg: Good signature from "Riseup Networks <collective@riseup.net>"
Primary key fingerprint: 4E07 9126 8F7C 67EA BE88  F1B0 3043 E2B7 139A 768E

Stelle sicher, dass es die Aussage “Good signature” enthält und bestätige, dass die Schlüsselbezeichnung mit der vorher verifizierten übereinstimmt. Wenn der Text verändert wurde, ist die Information in der Erklärung nicht vertrauenswürdig.